When evaluating manuscripts, maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of authors is paramount. Upon submission, authors entrust editors with their scientific findings and creative work—assets that can significantly influence their reputation and career. Any disclosure of sensitive information during the review process may infringe upon the authors’ rights and jeopardize their professional standing.
Reviewers also have a right to confidentiality, which editors are obliged to uphold, except in cases involving suspected dishonesty or fraud. In all other circumstances, strict confidentiality must be maintained.
Editors are responsible for safeguarding all information related to submitted manuscripts. This includes—but is not limited to—the date of receipt, manuscript content, review status, reviewer comments, and editorial decisions. Such information should be disclosed only to the authors and reviewers directly involved in the evaluation process.
Reviewers are informed that manuscripts are confidential and remain the intellectual property of the authors. Both reviewers and editorial staff must respect the authors' rights by refraining from public discussions or the use of any ideas prior to publication. Reviewers should not make personal copies of manuscripts or share them without prior approval from the editor. After completing the review, reviewers are expected to return or securely dispose of all manuscript copies.
Consent from the reviewer, author, and editor is required before reviewer comments are made public or shared with third parties. This ensures the integrity of the review process and protects the interests of all parties involved.