Submission Preparation Checklist
All submissions must meet the following requirements.
- This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
- This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
- All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
- All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
- Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.
Research Articles
This section publishes original research articles that contribute new empirical findings, theoretical insights, or applied methodologies in aviation and related multidisciplinary fields. Manuscripts should present rigorous analysis, well-defined objectives, and clear implications for academic or practical advancement.
All submissions undergo a double-blind peer-review process involving at least two independent expert reviewers. Editorial decisions are based on the manuscript's originality, methodological quality, and overall contribution to the discipline.
Authors are expected to adhere to the journal's ethical standards regarding authorship, data integrity, and citation practices. Manuscripts must follow the journal's formatting and reference guidelines and include an abstract of no more than 250 words.
Review Articles
This section publishes original research articles that advance theoretical, empirical, or applied understanding in aviation and related multidisciplinary fields. Manuscripts should present novel findings, rigorous methodologies, and clear implications for practice or future research.
All submissions undergo a double-blind peer-review process involving at least two independent reviewers. Editorial decisions are based on the manuscript's originality, methodological quality, and contribution to the discipline.
Authors are expected to adhere to the journal's ethical standards regarding authorship, data integrity, and citation practices. Manuscripts should follow the journal's formatting and reference guidelines and include an abstract of no more than 250 words.
Short Communication
This section publishes short communications that report concise, timely, and significant findings in aviation and related multidisciplinary fields. These papers typically present preliminary results, technical innovations, or focused analyses that contribute to ongoing research or practice.
All submissions undergo a double-blind peer-review process involving at least two independent reviewers. Editorial decisions are based on the clarity, novelty, and relevance of the contribution.
Authors are expected to adhere to the journal's ethical standards regarding authorship, data integrity, and citation practices. Manuscripts must follow the journal's formatting and reference guidelines and include an abstract of no more than 250 words.
Case Report
This section publishes case reports that present detailed analyses of individual events, situations, or implementations relevant to aviation and related multidisciplinary fields. Reports should provide valuable insights, lessons learned, or unique perspectives that contribute to understanding real-world applications, challenges, or innovations.
All submissions undergo a double-blind peer-review process involving at least two independent reviewers. Editorial decisions are based on the clarity, significance, and practical relevance of the case presented.
Authors are expected to adhere to the journal's ethical standards regarding authorship, data integrity, and citation practices. Manuscripts must follow the journal's formatting and reference guidelines and include an abstract of no more than 250 words.
Privacy Statement
When evaluating manuscripts, maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of authors is paramount. Upon submission, authors entrust editors with their scientific findings and creative work, which can significantly influence their reputation and career. Any disclosure of sensitive information during the review process may infringe upon the authors' rights and jeopardize their professional standing.
Reviewers also have a right to confidentiality, which editors are obliged to uphold, except in cases involving suspected dishonesty or fraud. In all other circumstances, strict confidentiality must be maintained.
Editors are responsible for safeguarding all information related to submitted manuscripts. This includes, but is not limited to, the date of receipt, manuscript content, review status, reviewer comments, and editorial decisions. Such information should be disclosed only to the authors and reviewers directly involved in the evaluation process.
Reviewers are informed that manuscripts are confidential and remain the intellectual property of the authors. Both reviewers and editorial staff must respect the authors' rights by refraining from public discussions or using any ideas before publication. Reviewers should not make personal copies of manuscripts or share them without prior approval from the editor. After completing the review, reviewers are expected to return or securely dispose of all manuscript copies.
Consent from the reviewer, author, and editor is required before reviewer comments are made public or shared with third parties. This ensures the integrity of the review process and protects the interests of all parties involved.