When evaluating manuscripts, it is crucial to maintain the privacy of the authors. Upon submission, authors entrust editors with their scientific findings and creative output, which could significantly impact their reputation and career. Therefore, during the review process, any disclosure of sensitive information could infringe upon the authors' rights. Reviewers also have a right to confidentiality, which should be upheld by the editors, except in cases of suspected dishonesty or fraud. In all other situations, confidentiality is paramount.
Editors are obligated to keep all manuscript-related information private. This includes the date of receipt, the content, the current status in the review process, reviewer feedback, and the final decision. Such information should be disclosed only to the authors and reviewers directly involved.
Furthermore, editors must inform reviewers that submitted manuscripts are confidential and owned by the authors. Reviewers and editorial staff are required to respect the authors' rights by avoiding public discussions or using the authors' ideas before publication. Reviewers should not make personal copies of the manuscript or share it without editor approval. Post-review, reviewers are expected to either return or dispose of manuscript copies. Editors should strive to handle manuscripts judiciously and avoid unjustified rejections.
Consent from the reviewer, author, and editor is essential before making reviewer comments public or sharing them with third parties. This ensures the integrity of the review process and protects the interests of all parties involved.
